Publication date: 30 Sep, 2020
A total of 3,199 guardianship orders were granted in the year 2019-20, a seven per cent rise on the previous year.
The majority of guardianship orders granted in 2019-20 were for people who either have a learning disability (49%), or dementia/Alzheimer’s disease (36%).
The Commission monitors the use of these orders in relation to the Adults with Incapacity Act and publishes details at national and local authority level in today’s report.
What did people think of their guardianship order?
The Commission also visits people who are on a guardianship order, and in 2019-20 met over 300 individuals. The new report contains example case studies of some visits, highlighting the views of both people subject to guardianship orders and their guardians.
In most cases people subject to a guardianship order were positive about how decisions were made on their behalf. Guardians, too, were mostly positive. In the few cases where issues were raised they mostly related to restrictions (from the individuals) or to the quality and level of care provided (from guardians).
Key gaps the commission identified
Three key gaps that the Commission itself identified during these visits include the lack of support and supervision for private guardians; only 76% had received a visit from a supervising officer in the past six months. A second concern was that only 76% had the correct medical certification from doctors for their medical treatment. A final area of real concern was the fact that for 67% of individuals with a do-not-attempt CPR (DNACPR) form, it was either unclear if guardians had been informed, or guardians had not been informed.
Main findings
The report’s main findings are:
Julie Paterson, chief executive, Mental Welfare Commission, said:
"Guardianship orders are designed to protect some of the most vulnerable people in our society. This new report includes a detailed statistical breakdown of what’s happening in relation to guardianship orders across Scotland, and also the views of people who are living with these orders - both individuals and their guardians.
"In previous years we have said that we believe the law needs to be modernised and streamlined to ensure care can be provided when it is needed, and to better protect the rights of people with dementia and learning disabilities. We welcome the commitment of the Scottish Government to reforming the Adults with Incapacity Act, which will be considered alongside the review of the Mental Health Act.
“Meantime, we hope that local authorities, integration joint boards, health and social care partnerships and others find the information in this report valuable as they plan and operate their services. We particularly ask that the issues we raise in relation to findings on our visits are addressed.”
Notes to editors
The Mental Welfare Commission monitors the use of legislation related to welfare provision and parts of the law related to medical consent and research.
The Commission also publishes advice and good practice guidance on the operation of the legislation.
Indefinite guardianships are those that do not have an expiry date. The Commission has always suggested that orders be time-limited, especially for young people where circumstances may change. Indefinite guardianships should be reviewed regularly, in keeping with both the principles of the Act and the code of practice.